Updating arxiv papers
Cook et al.'s methodology was so fatally flawed that they falsely classified skeptic papers as endorsing the 97% consensus, apparently believing to know more about the papers than their authors. (2013), the author self-ratings simply confirmed the worthlessness of their methodology, as they were not representative of the sample since only 4% of the authors (1189 of 29,083) rated their own papers and of these 63% disagreed with the abstract ratings. : This is misleading since only a very small minority of scientists have actually expressed a position on AGW from these organizations. 707-714, September 2006)- Vincent Gray Thermocline flux exchange during the Pinatubo event (PDF) (Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 33, Issue 19, October 2006)- D. 66-72, May 2007)- David Bellamy, Jack Barrett Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (PDF) (Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 12, Number 3, pp.
Policy statements release by a handful of council members or signed by just the president of a scientific organization can speak for no one other than these few scientists. Chilingar Conflicting Signals of Climatic Change in the Upper Indus Basin (PDF) (Journal of Climate, Volume 19, Issue 17, pp.
Supplemental papers include (but are not limited to): Addendums, Comments, Corrections, Discussions, Erratum, Rebuttals, Rejoinders, Replies, Responses, Supplemental Material, Updates and Submitted papers. When a significant new number of peer-reviewed papers is added the list title will be updated with the new larger number. Any known published correction will be included on the list following the original paper to show that these did not affect the author's original conclusions. (PDF) (Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp.
The list intentionally includes an additional 10 peer-reviewed papers as a margin of error at all times, which gradually increases between updates. Formatting: All papers are cited as: "Paper Name, Journal Name, Volume, Issue or Number, Pages, Date and Authors". Presidential Candidate (2004) "There was a massive study of every scientific article in a peer reviewed article written on global warming in the last ten years. Clark Jr Climate Change Reexamined (PDF) (Journal of Scientific Exploration, Volume 21, Number 4, pp. Kauffman Are there connections between the Earth's magnetic field and climate? Lett., 253, 328–339, 2007" by Bard, E., and Delaygue, M., Earth Planet. Lett., in press, 2007 (PDF) (Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 265, Issues 1-2, pp. Multi-scale analysis of global temperature changes and trend of a drop in temperature in the next 20 years (PDF) (Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Volume 95, January 2007)- Lin Zhen-Shan, Sun Xian Greenhouse effect in semi-transparent planetary atmospheres (PDF) (Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service, Volume 111, Number 1, pp. 1–27, February 2007)- Christopher Essex, Ross Mc Kitrick, Bjarne Andresen 180 years of atmospheric CO2 gas analysis by chemical methods (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 18, Number 2, pp.
: The IPCC states that, "climate sensitivity is likely (66%) to be in the range 2°C to 4.5°C, with a best estimate value of about 3°C." Thus, climate sensitivity estimates where the mean does not exceed 2°C (low end of the IPCC range) or the high end of the range does not exceed 3°C (the IPCC mean) are considered to support skeptical arguments for a low climate sensitivity.
All broken links will eventually be fixed by changing them to persistent URLs using the DOI system. Some papers are mutually exclusive and should be considered independently. This list will be updated and corrected as necessary. Criteria for Removal: Papers will only be removed if it is determined by the editor that they have not properly met the criteria for inclusion or have been retracted by the journal. Thus the actual number of peer-reviewed papers on the list can be much greater than stated. All Supplemental papers are preceded by an asterisk and italicized; Addendums, Comments, Corrections, Erratum, Replies, Responses and Submitted papers. They took a big sample of 10 percent, 928 articles. Presidential Candidate (2000) "I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been told by AGW voices that there are NO qualified skeptics or peer reviewed/published work by them. In truth there is serious work and questions raised by significant work by very qualified skeptics which has been peer reviewed and published. (PDF) (Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 253, Issues 3-4, pp. * Response to comment on "Are there connections between Earth's magnetic field and climate? 259-282, March 2007)- Ernst-Georg Beck * Comments on "180 years of Atmospheric CO2 Gas Analysis by Chemical Methods" (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 18, Number 5, pp. Criteria for Inclusion: All counted papers must be peer-reviewed, published in a scholarly journal and support a skeptic argument against ACC/AGW or Alarmism. Ordering of the papers is chronological per category. And you know the number of those that disagreed with the scientific consensus that we’re causing global warming and that is a serious problem out of the 928: Zero. It should be at least a bit disturbing for this type of denial to have been perpetrated with such a chorus. But it’s not right to misrepresent as not even existing the counter viewpoints. 641-646, September 2007)- Ernst-Georg Beck Climate Change is Nothing New!